VR SCHOOL ONLINE
  • Courses
  • Meta Campus
  • Log In
  • Join Free
  • Home
  • Courses

English 9A V2 — Foundations of Narrative, Rhetoric and Argument

Curriculum

  • 4 Sections
  • 34 Lessons
  • 10 Weeks
Expand all sectionsCollapse all sections
  • Unit 1: Foundations of Narrative Craft & The Hero’s Journey
    10
    • 1.1
      Introduction
      2 mins
    • 1.2
      The Epic Tradition, Invocation, and In Medias Res
      45 mins
    • 1.3
      Hospitality and the Rules of the Guest: Xenia in Books 5-8
      45 mins
    • 1.4
      Language Lab — Semicolons, Conjunctive Adverbs, and the Analytical Sentence
      40 mins
    • 1.5
      Seminar — Arete or Hubris? Odysseus in the Apologoi (Books 9-12)
      50 mins
    • 1.6
      Disguise and Recognition as Structure: Books 13-16
      45 mins
    • 1.7
      Writing Workshop — Thesis, Topic Sentence, and the Embedded Quotation
      50 mins
    • 1.8
      Dramatic Irony in the Hall: Books 17-20
      45 mins
    • 1.9
      Key Assignment — Heroic Archetype Analytical Essay (Books 21-24)
      150 mins
    • 1.10
      Ithaca Under Siege: Epic Craft in The Odyssey
      15 mins
  • Unit 2: Dualities of Human Nature & Gothic Allegory
    10
    • 2.1
      Introduction
      2 mins
    • 2.2
      Setting as Psychological Mirror — Fog, Doors, and Victorian London
      45 mins
    • 2.3
      The Murder as Turning Point: Chapters 3-4
      45 mins
    • 2.4
      Seminar — Biology or Repression? Emerson, Stevenson, and the Source of Hyde
      50 mins
    • 2.5
      Framed Narrative, Point of View, and the Colon
      45 mins
    • 2.6
      Unreliable and Withheld Narration: Chapters 5-6
      45 mins
    • 2.7
      Climax and the Pace of Dread: Chapters 7-8
      45 mins
    • 2.8
      Writing Workshop — Claim, Counterclaim, and the Concession Paragraph
      50 mins
    • 2.9
      Key Assignment — Symbolic Duality Argument Essay (Chapters 9-10)
      150 mins
    • 2.10
      Fog, Doors and the Mirror of London: Jekyll and Hyde
      15 mins
  • Unit 3: Rhetorical Appeals & The Art of Argument
    7
    • 3.1
      Introduction
      2 mins
    • 3.2
      The Rhetorical Triangle — Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in Pericles
      45 mins
    • 3.3
      Language Lab — Parallel Structure, Anaphora, and Rhetorical Cadence
      45 mins
    • 3.4
      Listening Lab — Evaluating a Speaker’s Reasoning and Naming Fallacies
      50 mins
    • 3.5
      Writing Workshop — The Four-Sentence Rhetorical Precis
      50 mins
    • 3.6
      Key Assignment — Rhetorical Analysis and Audience Rewrite
      150 mins
    • 3.7
      Pericles Speaks: Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Athens
      15 mins
  • Unit 4: Synthesis, Research, and Comparative Defense
    7
    • 4.1
      Introduction
      2 mins
    • 4.2
      Inheritance and Argument — How an Author Transforms Source Material
      45 mins
    • 4.3
      Research Lab — Source Credibility, Signal Phrases, and MLA Citation
      50 mins
    • 4.4
      Media Lab — The Same Subject in Different Mediums
      50 mins
    • 4.5
      Writing Workshop — Synthesis as Braiding, Not Reporting
      50 mins
    • 4.6
      Key Assignment — Synthesis Research Paper and Digital Presentation
      200 mins
    • 4.7
      The Research Library: Inheritance, Sources and Mediums
      15 mins

Key Assignment — Synthesis Research Paper and Digital Presentation

Unit 4  ·  Culminating Unit Assessment  ·  Lesson 26 of 26

Key Assignment — Synthesis Research Paper and Digital Presentation

W.9-10.6ENG9A-V2
By the end of this lesson I can…

produce a 1,200-1,500 word MLA synthesis research paper that reaches a position on the semester’s essential question, publish it digitally, and present the findings in four to five minutes using visual media that carries information my narration does not.

Workbook: pages 11–14 of your Unit 4 Student Workbook (paper planner p. 11, presentation evaluation sheet p. 12, peer review sheet p. 13, scoring rubric and revision log p. 14). Draft on paper first; anything scored is submitted online in this lesson.

Instruction

A diverse group of high school students sits at desks, each focused on drafting a research paper by hand

This is the semester’s culminating assessment, the fourth formal essay, and the piece that carries the semester’s word-count requirement over the line.

The essential question. To what extent does a person’s community determine the ethical boundaries they will observe in a moment of crisis? Answer it. A paper that reports what various people have thought and concludes that the matter is complex has not answered it.

Requirements. 1,200-1,500 words. Evidence from both full-length anchor texts and at least two vetted open-access secondary sources. A governing claim stated in the introduction and defended, not surveyed. Braided paragraphs in which your analysis outweighs the borrowed material. Signal phrases and MLA parenthetical citation throughout, with a Works Cited page and the annotated working bibliography attached. At least one paragraph in which you disagree with a secondary source, having first represented it fairly.

The digital publication requirement (W.9-10.6). The final paper is submitted as a formatted PDF and published to your course portfolio page, where your classmates can read it. Publishing is not a formality here: you will be writing for an audience of peers who have read the same two books, which is the most demanding audience you have had this semester.

The presentation (SL.9-10.4, SL.9-10.5). Four to five minutes. Present your findings — claim, strongest evidence, and the objection you took most seriously — with slides, an infographic or a concept diagram. The visual requirement is specific and it is scored: at least one visual must carry information your narration does not. A slide that reproduces your spoken sentences as bullet points fails this criterion. A timeline, a comparison matrix, a diagram of how two characters’ constraints differ — these pass.

Peer evaluation. Each student submits a structured evaluation of two classmates’ presentations against the rubric, naming one thing that was persuasive and one specific, actionable improvement. Evaluations are scored on specificity.

Accessibility and alternatives. Every recorded presentation must include a transcript or captions — your own transcript is acceptable and is part of the submission. A student who prefers not to record may deliver live to the instructor in a scheduled session and submit the annotated visual and script; both routes earn full credit.

Academic honesty. Every borrowed idea is cited whether quoted or paraphrased. Text generated by a language model is not a source and may not appear in the paper. The annotated bibliography is the record of your research and must reflect sources you actually read.

Reading: Synthesis paper and presentation: located passages, a model paper, a four-level rubric and a worked presentation

In a classroom or digital meeting setting, a student presents to peers using a projector or large monitor

Homer, The Odyssey, tr. Samuel Butler (1900), Project Gutenberg 1727; R. L. Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886), Standard Ebooks, https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/robert-louis-stevenson/the-strange-case-of-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde/text/single-page ; R. L. Stevenson, A Chapter on Dreams, in Across the Plains (1892), Project Gutenberg 614; retrieved 26 Sept. 2026 · SLS original; quoted passages are public domain (Homer, tr. Butler, 1900; Stevenson, 1886 and 1892)

Use the passages as a model of evidence, then build your own paper from the passages you choose.

What this reading supplies. The prompt, stages and short rubric are in the lesson. The lesson names two full-length works and two vetted secondary sources but hands you none of the passages, no full rubric, and no model of what a paper on the semester’s question looks like. Here you get: key passages from both anchor texts, each located by book or chapter; a note on the two open-access secondary sources that are always available; a model thesis, outline and exemplar paragraphs; the rubric at four levels; and a worked plan for the presentation and the peer evaluations. Editions: Homer, The Odyssey, tr. Samuel Butler (1900), Project Gutenberg 1727, https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1727 (prose, no line numbers, cited by book); Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886), Standard Ebooks, https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/robert-louis-stevenson/the-strange-case-of-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde/text/single-page (cited by chapter); Stevenson, “A Chapter on Dreams,” in Across the Plains (1892), Project Gutenberg 614, https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/614. All retrieved 26 Sept. 2026; wording as in the editions. The models and rubric are SLS original.

1. Key passages, located

These are the passages the model paper below uses. They are examples of the kind of evidence the assignment asks for, not a required list; you may use any passage from the two works, if you cite it accurately.

Odyssey, Book 9: the Cyclops on the gods and the guest

you are a fool, or else you know nothing of this country. Talk to me, indeed, about fearing the gods or shunning their anger? We Cyclopes do not care about Jove or any of your blessed gods, for we are ever so much stronger than they. I shall not spare either yourself or your companions out of any regard for Jove, unless I am in the humour for doing so.

Odyssey, Book 22: Ulysses on rejoicing over the dead

Old woman,” said he, “rejoice in silence; restrain yourself, and do not make any noise about it; it is an unholy thing to vaunt over dead men. Heaven’s doom and their own evil deeds have brought these men to destruction, for they respected no man in the whole world, neither rich nor poor, who came near them, and they have come to a bad end as a punishment for their wickedness and folly. Now, however, tell me which of the women in the house have misconducted themselves, and who are innocent.

Odyssey, Book 22: how the women die

So saying he made a ship’s cable fast to one of the bearing-posts that supported the roof of the domed room, and secured it all around the building, at a good height, lest any of the women’s feet should touch the ground; and as thrushes or doves beat against a net that has been set for them in a thicket just as they were getting to their nest, and a terrible fate awaits them, even so did the women have to put their heads in nooses one after the other and die most miserably.[178] Their feet moved convulsively for a while, but not for very long.

Odyssey, Book 23: Penelope on the suitors

It is some god who is angry with the suitors for their great wickedness, and has made an end of them; for they respected no man in the whole world, neither rich nor poor, who came near them, and they have come to a bad end in consequence of their iniquity;

Jekyll and Hyde, Story of the Door: the price of a scene

If you choose to make capital out of this accident,’ said he, ‘I am naturally helpless. No gentleman but wishes to avoid a scene,’ says he. ‘Name your figure.’ Well, we screwed him up to a hundred pounds for the child’s family; he would have clearly liked to stick out; but there was something about the lot of us that meant mischief, and at last he struck.

Jekyll and Hyde, Henry Jekyll’s Full Statement of the Case: concealment

Hence it came about that I concealed my pleasures; and that when I reached years of reflection, and began to look round me and take stock of my progress and position in the world, I stood already committed to a profound duplicity of life.

Other places to look (SLS original list). Odyssey: Book 1 (Zeus on human folly), Book 9 (the Cyclops), Book 11 (Agamemnon), Book 22 (the killing of the suitors and the women), Book 23 (Penelope’s test), Book 24 (Agamemnon on Penelope). Jekyll and Hyde: Story of the Door, Search for Mr. Hyde, The Carew Murder Case, Henry Jekyll’s Full Statement of the Case. These are chapter and book names the reader can find in any edition of the works.

2. Two secondary sources that are always available

The assignment asks for at least two vetted open-access secondary sources. These are two public-domain ones you can start from. They are Butler’s preface to his translation and Stevenson’s essay on dreams, both hosted and vetted in the Lesson 4.2 reading; you still have to say in your own annotation what each contributes and where it is limited. Below is one more passage from Butler’s preface, used in the model paper.

Samuel Butler, preface to the first edition (1900), on the division of the poem

For roughly the Return occupies eight Books, and Penelope and the Suitors sixteen.

3. Model thesis, outline and exemplar paragraphs (SLS original)

Thesis. A person’s community sets the ethical boundaries he will observe only as far as the community can see and enforce them: the Odyssey’s code of hospitality is enforced in public, so it licenses violence when it is broken, while Jekyll’s community demands only respectable appearance, so it produces a man free to do anything out of sight.

PartJobEvidence
IntroductionState the essential question and the thesis.None needed.
Paragraph 1The Odyssey: the code is public, so its enforcement is public and can be cruel.Book 9 (Cyclops), Book 22 (Ulysses, the women), Book 23 (Penelope), Butler’s count of books.
Paragraph 2Jekyll: the community demands appearance, so wrongdoing goes underground.Story of the Door (price of a scene); Jekyll’s concealment.
Paragraph 3 (disagreement)Represent a secondary source fairly, then disagree.Stevenson, A Chapter on Dreams.
ConclusionAnswer the essential question; do not survey.None needed.

Paragraph 1. The Odyssey’s code of hospitality is a public institution, and the poem lets the public enforce it. The Cyclops announces that his people do not care about Jove or any of your blessed gods (Butler, Book 9), and that announcement is the poem’s own account of why his cave is a place where the code has failed. The household’s judgment on the suitors is voiced afterward by Penelope, who says they respected no man in the whole world, neither rich nor poor, who came near them (Butler, Book 23). The community is behind the killing. But the same public support is what makes the cruelty possible, because it removes the check that a private conscience would supply. Ulysses tells Euryclea that it is an unholy thing to vaunt over dead men (Butler, Book 22), and in the same scene Telemachus decides the women will not die a clean death. The code restrains the boast and licenses the hanging. Butler’s division of the poem, which he admits scholars do not share, is disputed, but the arithmetic is his: the Return occupies eight Books, and Penelope and the Suitors sixteen (Butler, preface). Whatever one thinks of the theory, twice as many books go to the household’s judgment as to the journey.

Paragraph 2. Jekyll’s London works the other way: it demands an appearance and asks for nothing else. In the story of the trampled child, the witnesses fix a price for the family, and Hyde accepts it with No gentleman but wishes to avoid a scene (Stevenson, Story of the Door). The scene is settled by paying, not by asking what Hyde is; the boundary is drawn around the embarrassment. Jekyll’s own statement shows the same rule from inside. He says he concealed my pleasures until he stood committed to a profound duplicity of life (Stevenson, Full Statement). A community that only checks appearances trains its members to keep the appearance and move everything else out of sight, which is exactly where a drug that produces a second body is most useful.

Paragraph 3 (disagreement). Stevenson, in an essay about his own composition, gives the moral of the tale wholly to himself: The meaning of the tale is therefore mine (Stevenson, A Chapter on Dreams). I grant what he claims. The design is deliberate, and I am not arguing that his dream-helpers wrote it. But the claim understates what the tale itself shows. The pattern in Jekyll’s statement is a response to what his world expects of him, and Jekyll himself gives that pressure as the reason he hid. The meaning of the tale is Stevenson’s; the constraint that produces Hyde is the community’s. A reader who takes his sentence as the whole account loses that second half.

Conclusion sentence. To the extent a person’s community determines his limits in a crisis, it does so through what it can see: where the code is public, the community sets the limit and enforces it, sometimes past the point of cruelty; where the community sees only appearances, it sets no limit at all on what is done out of sight.

Works Cited (MLA, SLS original). Butler, Samuel. Preface to First Edition. The Odyssey, by Homer, translated by Samuel Butler, 1900. Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1727. Accessed 26 Sept. 2026. Homer. The Odyssey. Translated by Samuel Butler, 1900. Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1727. Accessed 26 Sept. 2026. Stevenson, Robert Louis. “A Chapter on Dreams.” Across the Plains, with Other Memories and Essays, 1892. Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/614. Accessed 26 Sept. 2026. Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. 1886. Standard Ebooks, standardebooks.org/ebooks/robert-louis-stevenson/the-strange-case-of-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde. Accessed 26 Sept. 2026.

What the exemplar does not do. It is about 520 words, well under the 1,200 to 1,500 the assignment requires, because it shows three paragraphs, not the whole paper. Your paper needs a longer introduction, at least one more body paragraph, and a second secondary source. The paper you write must be your own; copying this exemplar is a breach of the academic honesty section of the prompt.

4. Rubric at four levels (SLS original)

Criterion4 Exemplary3 Proficient2 Developing1 Beginning
Governing claim (W.9-10.2, W.9-10.7)A claim that answers the essential question, is stated in the introduction, and is defended in every paragraph.A claim is stated and mostly defended; one paragraph drifts.A claim exists but the paper mostly surveys views.Reports what others think and concludes the matter is complex.
Synthesis (W.9-10.7)Each paragraph begins with the writer’s claim; sources arrive inside the writer’s syntax; the writer’s analysis outweighs borrowed material throughout.Most paragraphs braided; one or two are reports.Paragraphs organized by source.A list of summaries.
Range and use of evidence (RL.9-10.1, W.9-10.8)Both anchor texts plus two vetted secondary sources; one paragraph disagrees with a source after representing it fairly.Both anchor texts and two sources; the disagreement paragraph is present but the source is not fairly represented.One anchor text weighted heavily, or one secondary source.Evidence from one text, or none quoted.
Research integrity (W.9-10.8, L.9-10.2.c)Signal phrases and accurate MLA parentheticals throughout; Works Cited matches the text exactly; annotated bibliography matches what was read.Minor form errors; every citation has an entry.Some borrowed material is uncited, or an entry is missing.Uncited borrowing or fabricated sources.
Digital publication (W.9-10.6)Published to the portfolio as a readable page for a peer audience.Published; formatting hinders reading.Submitted as a file but not published.Not submitted.
Presentation (SL.9-10.4, SL.9-10.5)Four to five minutes; the line of reasoning is easy to follow; at least one visual carries information the narration does not; transcript or captions supplied.Within time; visuals support but repeat the narration.Under or over time, or the reasoning jumps.Slides only repeat the spoken words; no transcript.
Peer evaluationBoth evaluations name one persuasive element and one specific, actionable improvement, each tied to the rubric.One evaluation is specific.Both are general.Not submitted.

5. The presentation, worked (SLS original)

The visual that passes the test. A matrix that the presenter does not read aloud cell by cell. The audience reads it while the presenter says the claim.

OdysseyJekyll and Hyde
Who sets the limitThe whole community: the guest-code of Jove, and a household that has judged the suitors.A professional class: lawyers, doctors, men who mind appearances.
What is enforcedA code of conduct, in public.An appearance of respectability.
What happens at a breachThe breach is punished at once and in the open.A price is paid privately, and the scene is closed.
What that permitsPublic violence that goes past the code (the women).Private wrongdoing that no one has to see (Hyde).

A four-minute plan. (1) 20 seconds: state the essential question and the claim. (2) 60 seconds: the matrix, with the presenter naming only the last row. (3) 60 seconds: the strongest passage, quoted and analyzed. (4) 60 seconds: the objection you took most seriously (the Stevenson paragraph above) and your answer. (5) 20 seconds: the answer to the question. Timing is about 150 words a minute, so the spoken script is about 600 words.

The transcript. Your transcript is your script with the on-screen text and the slide changes marked in brackets. It is submitted with the recording, and is acceptable as your captions.

6. Peer evaluation, worked (SLS original)

Sample. Persuasive: the matrix made the difference between the two communities visible before you spoke about it, so I understood your claim in ten seconds. Improvement: your strongest passage, the Book 22 hanging, was read aloud and then left; say what it shows about the code, not only what happens. If you add one sentence there, the objection that follows will land more clearly.

A weak evaluation says “good job” or “needs more evidence.” A strong one names an element, says why it worked, and names one change the student could make in the next hour.

Formative check

Work through these before moving on. They are not graded — they tell you, and your teacher, whether the standard below has landed yet.

Flashcard

synthesis

Tap to reveal
Answer

Writing in which the author’s claim governs and sources are brought in to serve it.

Flashcard

signal phrase

Tap to reveal
Answer

The words introducing borrowed material and framing its stance.

Flashcard

annotated bibliography

Tap to reveal
Answer

A source list in which each entry states the contribution and the limitation.

Flashcard

convention vs. choice

Tap to reveal
Answer

What a genre supplied, against what the author did with it.

+50 XP

Which visual satisfies the requirement that at least one visual carry information the narration does not?

Ask whether a listener would lose information by closing their eyes. If not, the visual is decoration.
Quick self-check

How confident are you that you can write a research paper that reaches a position on the essential question instead of surveying what others have said?

Not yetVery confident

Submit: Synthesis Research Paper (1,200-1,500 words) + Digital Presentation

Essential question: To what extent does a person’s community determine the ethical boundaries they will observe in a moment of crisis? Synthesize evidence from The Odyssey, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and at least two vetted open-access secondary sources, and reach a position.

Stages open in sequence and are scored separately.

Submission workflow

  1. Stage 1 — Research question, annotated bibliography and one braided paragraph. From Lesson 4.4. The two-sentence annotations and the statement of how the question changed are both scored.
  2. Stage 2 — Peer-reviewed rough draft (900+ words). Upload, peer-review two classmates, then submit a revision note naming one specific change and the feedback behind it.
  3. Stage 3 — Final paper (1,200-1,500 words) + Works Cited + annotated bibliography. Submit as PDF and publish to your course portfolio page.
  4. Stage 4 — Recorded presentation (4-5 minutes) with visual media and transcript, plus two structured peer evaluations. Live delivery in a scheduled session is an equal-credit alternative.

How it is scored

CriterionWhat proficient looks like
Governing claim (W.9-10.2, W.9-10.7)States a position on the essential question and defends it; does not survey views and declare complexity.
Synthesis (W.9-10.7)Sources are braided into paragraphs the writer’s claim governs; the writer’s analysis outweighs borrowed material throughout.
Range and use of evidence (RL.9-10.1, W.9-10.8)Both anchor texts plus two vetted secondary sources; one paragraph disagrees with a source after representing it fairly.
Research integrity (W.9-10.8, L.9-10.2.c)Signal phrases, accurate MLA citation, correctly spelled author names, annotated bibliography matching what was read.
Digital publication (W.9-10.6)Published to the portfolio page in a readable format for a peer audience.
Presentation (SL.9-10.4, SL.9-10.5)Four to five minutes; line of reasoning followable; at least one visual carries information the narration does not; transcript or captions supplied.
Peer evaluationBoth evaluations name one persuasive element and one specific, actionable improvement.

CCSS addressed in this lesson: W.9-10.6, W.9-10.2, SL.9-10.4, SL.9-10.5, L.9-10.6

UC A-G Area B pillar: Sustained research writing with digital presentation

Up NextComplete & Continue →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Writing Workshop — Synthesis as Braiding, Not Reporting
Prev
The Research Library: Inheritance, Sources and Mediums
Next

© 2026 VR School Online | Content by Wiley | Powered by Sejal Learning Systems.

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service

Modal title

Main Content