produce a 750-word rhetorical critique anchored in quoted evidence, rewrite a passage for a contemporary audience while preserving its argument, and deliver the rewrite aloud in appropriate formal English.
Workbook: pages 11–13 of your Unit 3 Student Workbook (rewrite planner p. 11, peer review sheet p. 12, scoring rubric and revision log p. 13). Draft on paper first; anything scored is submitted online in this lesson.
Instruction
This is the unit’s summative assessment and the third of the semester’s four formal essays. It has four parts, and the fourth is where SL.9-10.6 is assessed.
Choose your speech. Pericles’ Funeral Oration, Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman?”, Frederick Douglass’s “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” (1852), Chief Joseph’s surrender speech (1877), or Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (1863). All are public domain. You may not choose a speech you have already written about this year.
Part 1 — Rhetorical precis. Four sentences, the structure from Lesson 3.4. Submitted at Stage 1.
Part 2 — Rhetorical critique, 750 words. A thesis drawn from precis sentence 4. Three to four body paragraphs, each on a method — an appeal, a structural choice, a pattern of diction, a device — not on a topic. Every claim anchored to a quoted phrase, and every device analyzed for what it does in this speech, to this audience. At least one paragraph must address a choice that works against the speaker’s apparent interest, or a moment where the speech is vulnerable. MLA citation by paragraph or section.
Part 3 — Audience rewrite, about 150 words, plus annotations. Take one passage and rewrite it for an audience of contemporary ninth-grade students. The argument must survive intact — this is a translation of register, not a change of position. Then annotate three specific choices: a word you replaced and why, a sentence you restructured and what you preserved, and a reference you updated and what was lost in the update. The annotations are where L.9-10.3.a is scored; a rewrite with no annotations cannot be assessed.
Part 4 — Recorded delivery, two minutes. Deliver your rewritten passage aloud. You are being assessed on adapting speech to context: pacing, emphasis placed where your own structure puts it, and formal English appropriate to an academic audience — not on performance or memorization. A student who prefers not to record may submit an annotated script and deliver to the instructor in a scheduled one-to-one session; both routes earn full credit.
Academic honesty. The critique and the rewrite must be yours. The speech is the only text you may reproduce, and quotations must be marked and cited.
Reading: Douglass (1852) passages, a four-part model, and the four-level rubric
Frederick Douglass, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July? (1852), via Wikisource, https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=What_to_the_Slave_Is_the_Fourth_of_July%3F&action=render (retrieved 26 Sept. 2026) · SLS original; quoted passages are public domain (Douglass, 1852)
Read Passages A and B, then check each move in the model against the text before you plan your own speech.
What this reading supplies. The prompt, the four stages and the short rubric are in the lesson. What was missing was the text of the fifth speech, a four-level rubric, and a worked model of all four parts. Here you get: (1) where each of the five speeches is hosted; (2) the Douglass passages, which are not hosted anywhere else in this course except the opening of the speech in Lesson 2.4; (3) an SLS-original model of every part of the project, built on the Douglass passage so that you can check each move against text you can see; (4) the rubric at four levels. Source: Frederick Douglass, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July? (delivered on Monday, 5 July 1852, and published that year as an oration delivered in Corinthian Hall, Rochester, New York), text from Wikisource, https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=What_to_the_Slave_Is_the_Fourth_of_July%3F&action=render, retrieved 26 September 2026. Spelling and punctuation are the source’s. The models, the rewrite and the rubric are SLS original and are not Douglass’s words.
1. Where each speech is hosted
| Speech | Where the text is | What is there |
|---|---|---|
| Pericles, Funeral Oration (Thucydides, tr. Crawley, 1874) | Lesson 3.1 reading | Long excerpts, four passages |
| Sojourner Truth, Ain’t I a Woman? (1851, Gage version 1863) | Lesson 3.3 reading | The Gage transcription; the reading notes that other versions exist |
| Lincoln, Gettysburg Address (1863) | Lesson 3.4 reading | The whole speech, 272 words |
| Chief Joseph, message of surrender (1877) | Lesson 3.4 reading | The whole message as reported by General Howard; a report, not a transcript |
| Douglass, Fourth of July (1852) | This reading (section 2), and the opening in Lesson 2.4 | Two passages that carry the speech’s turn |
If the speech you choose is hosted in another lesson, reread it there before you start. Every quotation in your critique has to be copied from the hosted text, not from memory.
2. The Douglass passages
Passage A is the turn: the speaker has been invited to celebrate and explains why he cannot. Passage B is the direct answer to the question the whole speech asks.
Passage A: Fellow-citizens, pardon me
Fellow-citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here to-day? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? and am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?
Would to God, both for your sakes and ours, that an affirmative answer could be truthfully returned to these questions! Then would my task be light, and my burden easy and delightful. For who is there so cold, that a nation’s sympathy could not warm him? Who so obdurate and dead to the claims of gratitude, that would not thankfully acknowledge such priceless benefits? Who so stolid and selfish, that would not give his voice to swell the hallelujahs of a nation’s jubilee, when the chains of servitude had been torn from his limbs? I am not that man. In a case like that, the dumb might eloquently speak, and the “lame man leap as an hart.”
But, such is not the state of the case. I say it with a sad sense of the disparity between us. I am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice, are not enjoyed in common.—The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity and independence, bequeathed by your fathers, is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought life and healing to you, has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony.
Passage B: What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July?
What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.
Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the old world, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the every day practices of this nation, and you will say with me, that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.
3. A worked model of all four parts (SLS original, on Passage A)
This is one way to do each part. Your speech is different, so your moves will be different; the purpose is to show the level of detail each part needs.
Part 1. Rhetorical precis (four sentences)
- Douglass, speaking in Rochester on 5 July 1852 to an audience gathered for the Fourth of July celebration, refuses the role of grateful celebrant he has been invited to play, arguing that the holiday’s blessings belong to his listeners and not to the enslaved people he represents.
- He opens with a chain of rhetorical questions about whether the Declaration’s principles reach him, concedes that a yes would make his task easy, then turns on the words
But, such is not the state of the case.
into short declarations that divide you from me, and closes the passage with the image of a man in fetters dragged into a temple of liberty. - His purpose is to make the audience feel the exclusion before he argues it, so that the argument that follows lands on people who have already been placed on the other side of the holiday.
- He writes in a tone of controlled bitterness for an audience that has gathered to celebrate and has invited him to speak, treating them as citizens who can be held to their own stated principles.
Part 2. Critique: thesis, outline and one paragraph
Thesis (from precis sentence 4). Douglass turns his audience’s own holiday against them: by using the grammar of celebration to stage a refusal to celebrate, he makes the audience experience the exclusion before he argues it.
Outline, one method per paragraph (not one topic).
- Rhetorical questions that grant the audience its premises before withdrawing them. Evidence:
Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us?
- A pronoun division that puts the audience on one side of a line. Evidence:
This Fourth July is yours, not mine.
followed byYou may rejoice, I must mourn.
- An extended image that recasts the invitation as an insult. Evidence:
To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty
- The vulnerability paragraph, below.
Model vulnerability paragraph. The passage’s greatest risk is also its most deliberate choice. Douglass tells the people whose goodwill he needs that their invitation is inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony
, and then warns them, by way of a parallel with a nation destroyed for its crimes, that they are copying a dangerous example. A speaker who wanted only applause would not do this. He is also exposed on a second front: the whole refusal depends on the audience granting that the Declaration’s principles apply to everyone, and the passage cannot force that agreement. It can only make refusing it uncomfortable. That is why the passage spends its first half asking questions instead of asserting answers. The speech is strongest where it lets the audience convict itself, and weakest for any listener who is prepared to answer the questions with a plain no.
Notice what the model does with the warning about a destroyed nation: it paraphrases and says so (“by way of a parallel”) instead of putting quotation marks around words Douglass did not use. When you paraphrase, make that visible; when you quote, copy exactly.
Part 3. Audience rewrite with three annotations
Rewrite of the last five sentences before the fetters image, for contemporary ninth graders (SLS original, about 70 words). The block below is SLS original, not Douglass, and must not be quoted as his.
The good things you celebrate today are not shared equally. Your ancestors left you a rich inheritance of fairness, freedom and success, and you enjoy it. I do not. The same sun that warmed and healed you whipped and killed me. This holiday belongs to you, not to me. You get to celebrate. I have to grieve.
| Annotation | What I did | What it costs |
|---|---|---|
| A word replaced | Bequeathed became left you. The original word is legal and formal; a ninth grader hears left you at once. | A little of the legal weight is gone. Bequeathed makes the inheritance sound like a will, something formally owed. |
| A sentence restructured | The long sentence about sunlight became two pairs of verbs, warmed and healed against whipped and killed. The antithesis (you against me, life against death) is preserved. | The original has a slower build, so the reversal in its last clause arrives as a shock. The rewrite gives the reversal away sooner. |
| A reference updated | Your fathers became your ancestors, because a ninth grader may not hear the founders in the older phrase. | The original points at one specific generation, the founders, whom the audience is celebrating. Ancestors is vaguer and lets the audience off the hook. |
Part 4. Delivery notes
Mark your script, then read it aloud. In the model rewrite, the three short closing sentences carry the emphasis, so the marks fall there:
The same sun that warmed and healed you [pause] whipped and killed me. [longer pause] This holiday belongs to you, [pause] not to me. [pause] You get to celebrate. [pause] I have to grieve. [stop; do not speed up]
Two things are assessed: the pause falls where your own sentence structure puts it, and the register is formal English suitable for an academic audience. Neither depends on performing well. If you prefer not to record, submit the marked script and deliver it once in a scheduled one-to-one session; both routes earn full credit.
4. Rubric at four levels (SLS original)
| Criterion | 4 Exemplary | 3 Proficient | 2 Developing | 1 Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precis (W.9-10.2.b, RI.9-10.2) | All four sentences accurate; sentence 1 uses a verb that names what the speaker does, not talks about; sentence 2 gives method and order; sentence 4 names the stance toward the audience precisely. | Three sentences accurate; one is a topic summary instead of a method description. | Two or more sentences summarize content only; no stance named. | Restates the speech; no verbs of rhetorical action. |
| Analysis of method (RI.9-10.6) | Every paragraph analyzes one method for what it does in this speech to this audience; each claim rests on a quoted phrase; the analysis is longer than the quotation. | Most paragraphs analyze method; one or two claims are supported but not analyzed. | Paragraphs are organized by topic; devices are named but not explained. | Retells the speech; no method identified. |
| Vulnerability paragraph (RI.9-10.8) | Identifies a real risk or exposed point, tied to a quoted phrase, and explains why the speaker accepted it. | Identifies a risk but does not say why the speaker accepted it, or the quotation is loose. | Mentions weakness in general terms. | Absent or only praises the speech. |
| Rewrite fidelity (L.9-10.3.a, W.9-10.4) | Register changes and the argument does not; three annotations name a word, a structure and a reference, and each says what was lost. | Argument intact; two of three annotations say what was lost. | Argument partly changed, or annotations name choices without costs. | Position changed or no annotations. |
| Delivery (SL.9-10.6) | Formal English, emphasis where the writer’s structure puts it, pace steady; or the annotated script and one-to-one delivery meet the same standard. | Formal English; emphasis mostly right. | Register slips or emphasis is arbitrary. | Reads at a single pace with no adaptation, or is not submitted. |
| Recursive process (W.9-10.5) | The Stage 2 revision note names one substantive change and the peer comment that caused it. | Names a change; the link to peer feedback is loose. | Names a change that is only editing. | No revision note. |
Reading a rubric row. If you are between two levels, read the higher one aloud and ask whether your work meets every clause. If one clause fails, the row is the lower level.
Formative check
Work through these before moving on. They are not graded — they tell you, and your teacher, whether the standard below has landed yet.
ethos / pathos / logos
Tap to revealAppeals from credibility, from emotion and values, and from reasoning.
anaphora
Tap to revealRepetition of the same words at the head of successive clauses.
antithesis
Tap to revealOpposed ideas in parallel grammatical form, so the structure performs the contrast.
false dilemma
Tap to revealTwo options presented as exhaustive when others exist.
register
Tap to revealThe level of formality and vocabulary selected for a particular audience.
In the audience rewrite, a student replaces Pericles’ claim that Athens is “a pattern to others than imitators ourselves” with “Athens does its own thing instead of copying.” What is the problem?
How confident are you that you can change a passage’s register for a new audience without changing what it argues?
Submit: Rhetorical Analysis Project (4 parts)
Task: Select one public-domain speech from the course archive and complete a four-part rhetorical analysis: precis, 750-word critique, 150-word audience rewrite with annotations, and a two-minute recorded delivery of the rewrite.
Stages open in sequence and are scored separately.
Submission workflow
- Stage 1 — Precis & critique outline. The four-sentence precis, the derived thesis, three method-based topic sentences and one quoted phrase each.
- Stage 2 — Peer-reviewed rough draft of the critique (550+ words). Upload, peer-review two classmates against the rubric, then submit a revision note naming one specific change and the feedback behind it.
- Stage 3 — Final critique (750 words) + audience rewrite (about 150 words) + three annotations. MLA, PDF.
- Stage 4 — Recorded delivery (2 minutes) of the rewritten passage. Annotated script plus a scheduled one-to-one delivery is an equal-credit alternative.
How it is scored
| Criterion | What proficient looks like |
|---|---|
| Precis accuracy (W.9-10.2.b, RI.9-10.2) | Sentence 1 uses a rhetorically accurate verb; sentence 2 describes method and order, not topics; sentence 4 names the stance toward the audience. |
| Analysis of method (RI.9-10.6) | Each paragraph analyses a device for what it does in this speech to this audience; no claim floats free of a quoted phrase. |
| Vulnerability paragraph (RI.9-10.8) | Addresses a choice that works against the speaker’s interest, or a point where the argument is exposed. |
| Rewrite fidelity (L.9-10.3.a, W.9-10.4) | Register changes; the argument does not. Annotations name a word, a structure and a reference, and say what was lost. |
| Delivery (SL.9-10.6) | Formal English adapted to an academic audience; emphasis falls where the writer’s own structure places it. |
| Recursive process (W.9-10.5) | Stage 2 revision note shows a substantive change traceable to peer feedback. |