An approved lip-synced dialogue shot supported by a documented revision process.
Students prepare compatible picture and audio, create lip-synced performances, diagnose artifacts, and use editing strategies when generation cannot meet the shot requirement.
Section 6: Lip Sync and Performance · Lesson 1 of 5 (26 of 45) · 60 minutes · Evidence: Lip sync input package
Watch any film with the sound off and you can still tell when someone is speaking. The jaw drops, the lips close on certain sounds, the eyes follow the thought. Lip sync tools try to recreate that from two files: a picture of a face and a recording of a voice. The tool can only work with what you hand it, so today’s job is to build the best possible handoff.
Production journal: write your answer below.
What must a filmmaker understand before they can prepare a clear face image and clean dialogue file for reliable lip sync?
Lip sync animates a face so its mouth and surrounding muscles match an audio track. The tool looks at your face image, listens to your audio, and predicts how that face would move while making those sounds. It is a prediction, not a recording, which means weak inputs produce weak predictions. Nearly every disappointing result traces back to the picture or the sound that went in.
Check four things before you submit a face:
Clean dialogue means one voice, speaking clearly, with no music, wind, or room echo underneath. A tool listens to every sound in the file, so a gull cry or a drum loop can look like a mouth movement. Then check three more things:
For Last Light, the student wants Mara to say, “The lamp has never failed us.” The portrait she likes best has Mara glancing sideways at the sea with her scarf pulled up over her chin. Rejected: the mouth is hidden and the head is turned. A second portrait has her facing the camera, lips together, round copper glasses clear of her cheeks, soft light: chosen. The recording of the line has two seconds of wind before the first word and a gull at the end. The student re-records it indoors, trims it to a 6.4-second clip with a quarter second of quiet on each side, and names it with the course convention.
Creators who make talking characters follow a quiet preparation routine before they ever press generate. Study it as if you were looking over their shoulder, and for each step ask: who decides, the person or the tool?
The creator starts with a character image and checks the face the way an editor checks a shot: is the mouth visible, is the head square to the camera, is anyone else in the frame? If not, they make a new image or crop one rather than hoping the tool will cope. Then they turn to the voice. They either record a line or produce one with an approved voice tool, listen on headphones, and cut away everything that is not speech. Only then do they pair the two files and start the tool.
Notice what the software does and does not do. It may offer to detect a face or to extend a clip, but it will not tell you that the audio has a hum in it or that the portrait hides half the lips. Those judgments are yours, and they are cheap to make now and expensive to fix after generation.
As you study, record each decision point in your production journal.
| Decision point | What the filmmaker does | What the tool automates | What still needs human review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose the face image | Checks angle, mouth visibility, expression, and number of faces | Can generate or detect a face on request | Whether the lips are truly readable at full size, not just in a thumbnail |
| Prepare the audio | Records or generates one clean line, then trims silence and noise | May denoise or normalize volume if asked | Whether anything but speech remains, and whether the voice is authorized |
| Set clip length | Cuts the line to the length the shot needs and the tool allows | Enforces a maximum length or rejects the file | Whether the line still makes sense when shortened |
| Label and package inputs | Names files, records source and permission | Nothing; this is a human record | That the face and voice are both documented as authorized |
Studio task: Evaluate face angle mouth visibility audio length and silence in sample inputs.
Your teacher provides a set of sample faces and sample audio clips, some good and some flawed on purpose. Work with a partner.
Coaching tips. View the face image at the size it will appear in your film, not zoomed in on a single feature. If you cannot tell whether the lips are parted or closed, the tool will not be able to either. For audio, close your eyes and listen once for noise only; the second time, listen for words.
FACE IMAGE (file name): ______ Angle 0-2: __ Mouth visible 0-2: __ Neutral expression 0-2: __ One face 0-2: __ Biggest weakness: ______ AUDIO (file name): ______ Length (seconds): ____ Silence at start/end: ____ / ____ Anything besides one voice? ______ Source and permission for face: ______ Source and permission for voice: ______
Studio task: Prepare and label the approved face and dialogue inputs.
Prepare the inputs for the first dialogue shot of your own film.
Checklist before you submit:
Name one input condition that would cause failure.
Deliverable: Lip sync input package.
Submit the lip sync input package. The file must use the course naming convention and include enough process evidence to show the student's decisions and revisions.
File name (course naming convention): AIF_S06-L01_lip-sync-input-package_v01_YOURINITIALS
| Criterion | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The work addresses the stated story or production purpose. | The face and line serve the planned shot, and the choice is justified against the story moment. | The face and line suit the planned shot. | The face or line only loosely fits the planned shot. | The inputs do not connect to a planned shot. |
| The student applies the required method accurately and produces usable capstone evidence. | Both inputs meet every check, with measured length and trim noted; another student could reproduce the package. | Both inputs meet the checks and are labeled with the naming convention. | One input meets the checks; the other has an unresolved flaw. | Inputs are unsuitable or unlabeled. |
| The student identifies at least one quality issue and records a meaningful revision decision. | Names the weakest input, tests or compares an alternative, and records a specific revision. | Identifies a quality issue and records a meaningful revision decision. | Notes a problem without a clear revision. | No revision decision recorded. |
| The work complies with consent rights attribution privacy disclosure and school policy. | Provenance and written authorization recorded for the face and the voice, with an alternative route documented. | Provenance and authorization recorded for both files. | Provenance is recorded for only one file. | Uses a real person’s face or voice, or unlicensed material, without permission. |
Requirement: Use only an authorized character face and voice.
A face and a voice are a person’s identity, and lip sync joins them. Use only a face you created, generated with your school-approved tool, or that a consenting person released in writing, and do the same for the voice. Never pair a real person’s likeness with words they did not say. Write down where each file came from before you generate, and keep that note with the files.